Gravity over Mass Concept

Gravity Over Mass Concept -
INTRODUCTION

The following write-up, reveals a novel way for understanding relationships between mass, gravity and weight. As a starting point, we need to first understand how atomic-mass gets created from such a minute-amount of matter. Through particle-physics experiments, we know that atoms consist of primarily empty-space. In fact, ~99.9999...% of an atom's volume is typically regarded as empty space! Let's now investigate the atomic structure as its conventionally understood.

The Atomic Structure

An atom's nucleus is very-approximately 100,000-times smaller than the atom as a whole. Depending upon the chemical-element, an atom's nucleus contains one or more protons, and zero or more neutrons. An atoms fundamental identity and character, relies up0n the number of (positively-charged) protons within its nucleus.   

The atom's simplest-form is that of hydrogen. More specifically, it's hydrogen's most-common isotope, which is protium. Protium is the simplest atom of them all. It's the simplest-atom because it has merely one proton and one electron. Due to its single-proton, hydrogen was assigned the chemical-element number-one. "One" is hydrogen's "atomic number" or Z value. 

Electrons hover about an atom's nucleus within so-called "electron clouds". These electron clouds are mathematically-determined areas of probability. Whatever the "orbital path" is for the electrons within an atom, no-one truly knows. Nonetheless, we understand that electrons prefer to avoid one another. This is substantiated by two important facts.

• All electrons carry the same electrical-charge. Identical charges always repel each other.
• Fundamentally, electrons are classified as fermions due to their 1/2 integer spin. The well-established Pauli Exclusion Principle states: no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state at the same time.

Regardless of the preceding statements, if we could actually confine all of an atom's electrons into one small area - we would see that these electrons comprise a similar volume-of-space as their respective nucleus.

Now let's discuss atomic-mass for a moment. Protons and neutrons carry the bulk of an atom's mass and it's understood that a neutron is ever-so-slightly heavier than its proton counterpart. As an add-hock form of understanding, although electrons and protons are comparably-similar in size when looking at the volume-of-space each comprises, an electron's mass is merely 1/1836 from that of a proton. Comparably similar, an electron's mass is merely 1/1839 from that of a neutron.

The classical view of an atom's mass, focuses upon the large resting-mass of an atom's nucleus as just described. So basically the classical view for atomic-mass, focuses upon the number of an atom's protons and neutrons.

Due to particle accelerators, once quarks and gluons were discovered - a modern understanding of atomic-mass brought energy to the forefront. Currently methodologies for creating mass, focus more upon the binding-energy of the Strong Force and the Higg's Mechanism.

What I've described thus far, is a 30,000 foot view of an atom's structure. We will now begin to think outside-of-the-box so to speak, as we continue. 

Creating Mass with Kinetic Energy

There is much to unfold here particle-wise, but that's for another day. Currently, we are gaining a deeper understanding of mass, weight, and gravity. Very-importantly, atoms are often considered to be merely empty-space if we could simply pluck-out their electrons, protons and neutrons.

As particles, electrons gain momentum through the electrical-force of attraction. Electrons are understood to be negatively-charged; whereas protons, located within an atom's core, are commonly understood to be positively-charged. So without going any deeper into any theory - an electron is naturally attracted to an atom's nucleus.

Electrons carry momentum as well as a significant amount of kinetic-energy. The amount of an electron's kinetic-energy is quite-important. From a resting-mass standpoint, since electrons are extremely-light compared to the nucleons within the atom's core, it's the electrons which do most of the moving.

A Balanced Approach for Creating Mass

Spurred on by electrical-magnetic forces, atomically-bound electrons take their turn at pummeling the atom's core. The kinetic-energy of these electrons while striking the atom’s core from high above, is what creates a good-percentage of an atom's mass. Basically, every atomically-bound electron takes their turn at striking their respective atom’s core.

As a collective, electrons consecutively strike with an equal amount of force upon the nucleus from various directions. This creates a balance of forces upon the atom's nucleus. This what creates a good-percentage of atomic mass. To be crystal clear, I am not stating that this action of electrons striking the atom's core is where all of the mass comes from. I do believe however, that this striking-action contributes to a decent-percentage of an atom's overall mass.

A deeper understanding of this scenario is quite difficult to explain from a conventional understanding of the electron. Please understand, that there are particles much smaller in size than what we currently comprehend within the Standard Model. I refer to these minuscule (so far undetected particles) as being sub-sub-atomic in size. Basically, these sub-sub-atomic particles in addition to the electrons is what comprises electron clouds.

As an electron pummels the atom's core, it releases a good portion of its mass. In simple terms, this mass can be considered as the atom's load. After this electron releases its mass, it gets ejected from the atom's core. Distal from the atom's core, a shuffling-event between electrons occurs. The next electron in line, spirals downwards towards the nucleus. Essentially, electrons each take their turn to drive mass towards the atom's core.

Through sequential cycling of atomically-bound electrons, the forces around the atom's nucleus is balanced from all sides. When perfectly balanced, the atom's core is virtually stationary. 

A Directional-Bias Creates Weight

In contrast to the previous scenario, whenever an atom is within a gravitational-field, there is always a directional-bias which steers it into a specific direction. Due to earth's gravity, atoms are commonly pointed towards earth's center. Since gravity is virtually ubiquitous from either the a planet or sun's gravitational-field, it's a rare-occasion when an atom doesn't experience an imbalance of forces upon its nucleus.

When under the influence of earth’s gravity, more force gets exerted upon the upper-surface of an atom’s core versus its lower-surface. This directional-bias is what pushes atoms in a downward direction. By utilizing the unseen gravitational environment, atoms commonly become biased and steer themselves towards the center of the earth.

Although previously only theorized, I will state that there’s a ubiquitous sea of physical matter which is many-times smaller than the conventionally-understood particles within physic's Standard Model. The field-effect of this underlying matter is what gives atomic-structures the ability to move as a single-familiar-unit within a gravitational-field.

So in principle, earth’s gravitational-field borrows a certain amount of an atom’s mass in order to project it downwards. Due to this realization, I created a load-cell device in order to prove this out.

Gravity over Mass Experiment

Through experimentation, I found that as matter moves quickly-downwards it’s effective mass decreases to approximately 93% to 85% of its measured mass (weight). This experiment involved an angled wooden-chute; whereby its weight was continually being monitored through a fixed-set of four load-cells upon a stationary base. Each object under test would be weighted twice. Once while stationary immediately before it moved, and once again while it was moving. I found that while it was moving, its weight actually went down! This confirms what I had just-earlier been describing.

There was no real magic required to produce this experiment, other than to ensure that all of its components were appropriately sized. The instrumentation had to be sensitive enough to detect a comparatively-small variance in weight as the object (or objects) were quickly moving down the chute. As the experiment was being performed, the weight of its (stationary) supportive-assembly had to be virtually ignored. So, the assembly being weighed had to be extremely-light when compared to the fast-moving load in question.

Importantly, merely by understanding that virtually all of the energy required to push an object downwards is borrowed from the mass of the object itself, fills a huge-void of knowledge. I suspect that at least 99.99% or more of the energy required for gravity to take hold (upon atomic structures) is borrowed from the mass of the object-in-question. As a consequence, the theoretical graviton particles are not required!

From an atom's perspective, gravity is not an attractive-force, but one that pushes. This pushing-effect persuades electrons to congregate within a certain area along an atom's perimeter; whereby, this area is located opposite to that of earth's surface. From this-side of the atom's nucleus, whenever an electron drives towards its respective-atom's center... it pummels the nucleus (which contains most of an atom's mass) and drives this nucleus towards earth's surface.

Gravity is a pilot-like force which produces a directional-bias upon the atomic-structure. Whenever an atom senses a bias, it then steers itself into a specific direction. This phenomenon is what creates what we refer to here as "weight". So, under earth's gravitational-field, atoms are influenced to become directionally-biased. This is not exactly the same thing, but think of how differently one of the wheels on your car reacts when it's balanced versus when its not.

In order for a molecular-object to achieve a particular-weight which we can then measure, it has to first borrow a certain-amount of mass from the atoms within its molecular structure. If we take this scenario one-step further, for an object to achieve motion - further mass has to be borrowed from the object-in-question in order to sustain its movement. Logically, this is what's perceived as momentum.

As a result of all this, the "full mass" of an object can never be fully-realized unless it was located within an area of empty-space that's void of any gravitational-field. In all other cases, a certain amount of an object's mass is always used to create weight and/or movement.

test for video link

Destinations

Follow Lawrention on X

Follow on Truth Social

Sharing

XPinterestWhatsAppTumblr