• Strong Nuclear Force — The strong force (or strong interaction) binds quarks into hadrons. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) that concerns quarks and gluons, basically defines this force. Its residual effect provides the attractive force between protons and neutrons that overcomes the electromagnetic repulsion between positively-charged protons, thereby binding them into atomic nuclei.
• Electromagnetic Force — The electromagnetic force acts between electrically charged particles, producing attraction between opposite charges and repulsion between like charges. It underlies electricity, magnetism, electric fields, magnetic fields, and chemical bonding.
• Weak Nuclear Force — Responsible for radioactive beta-decay (neutrons versus protons), crucial for the nuclear fusion process, functions at an extremely short range.  
• Gravitational Force — The force of attraction between any two objects having mass. Curiously, although it's the weakest of these four fundamental forces — it has infinite range.

The Standard Model describes the fundamental forces; within it, electroweak theory gives a unified description of two of them: the electromagnetic force and the weak nuclear force. The electromagnetic force works at long ranges and the weak nuclear force works at extremely short ranges.  

The electroweak theory supplies the mathematical framework that successfully predicted the existence and properties for W and Z bosons. This unified force is often referred to as the electroweak force or electroweak interaction. 

At energies above the electroweak scale (~100 GeV, about 100 times the rest energy of a proton) the two forces (electromagnetic force/weak nuclear force) are indistinguishable and manifest as a single electroweak force. 

The phenomenon of this unified force is a similitude for what's later described in chapter-four as we tackle the topic of spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Chapter Two

The Informational Realm:
A New Frontier

In order to understand certain aspects of the working atom, we are about to delve deep into its underbelly. This journey goes well beyond a conventional understanding.

Please note, this is neither a complete nor polished description, it is merely an early assessment — particularly concerning the atom's physical arrangement. I am sure my thoughts and impressions will evolve over time.

As an example of this immense difference in scale, consider that early computers were once so large — that they required an entire room to house a single machine.

As technology advanced through the second-half of the 20th century, computers became smaller and smaller. As processors and memory-chips shrank in size — computers not only became far more powerful, but also dramatically more efficient. The amount of energy required to process and store information today, is a mere pittance of what it once was.

Energy-wise, the scenario I just described is supported by the laws of physics. The smaller we go in scale — the more efficient it becomes to store, retrieve, and process information.

It seems uncanny however, that even though modern information-processing is orders of magnitude more efficient than it once was — we require vastly more total-power to run today’s massive data centers. This paradox highlights just how much information is now propagating through our terrestrial sphere.

Incredibly, Ireland has a significant concentration of data-centers extracting power from their grid. In the year 2024, these data centers soaked up roughly 22% of Ireland's metered electricity. 

1. Introducing Seedicles
2. Verifying Seedicle Existence Via Quarks
3. Hadrons of the Standard Model
4. The Power and Consistency of Twos and Threes
5. A Candid View of The Standard Model

5.1 Introducing Seedicles

As I revealed earlier, seedicles bridge the gap between the Standard Model realm (SMR) and the Light Realm (LR).

If you have ever heard physicists describe particles popping in and out of existence, well, that is exactly what's occurring! Simply speaking, seedicles attempt to garner enough mass until they qualify as a SM particle.

I am sure this next part is of no surprise to many, but form-wise — seedicles are comprised of string-like matter. Now, before your mind goes off into a bazillion and one directions (as the study of string theory is huge), please let me state the following: seedicles are discrete and uniform. Essentially, they are the most fundamental gauge-particle that concerns the Standard Model. 

If these seedicles varied significantly in size from one to another, the Standard Model as we know it would not exist. In fact, if these seedicles were not gauge particles there would be neither uniform size nor mass at the atomic scale.

String-theory’s popularity stems from the fact that strings oscillate through various frequencies. This is why so many musical instruments use strings — the number of notes, chords, and scales they can achieve are enormous.

Importantly, each seedicle's string (or strand) is electrically conductive. A "current flow" through any single string tends to either straighten or buckle the string in question.  

Seedicles never truly synchronize with fellow seedicles nor other forms of matter. They continuously wiggle about, are highly active, reactive, and very independent while non-confined.

Since seedicles operate through a plethora of frequencies, they are aptly-suited as intermediaries. They have the ability to rapidly climb up and down the electromagnetic-spectrum to suit their environment. They are quite robust and virtually indestructible. 

Although I don't consider any particle to be actually massless from an absolute standpoint — seedicles have virtually no mass. This is why they cannot be detected directly. They basically serve as a massless background for the Standard Model's particle-zoo. 

5.2 Using Quarks to Verify a Seedicle's Existence

As a group, the existence of seedicles is perhaps the primary factor that determines the consistency of the Standard Model. However, tracking these elusive particles is like a mystical shell-game. Honing in on particle decay, is perhaps the only way to actually track them.

I don't believe that seedicles actually "decay" . As I refer to particle decay, I am now speaking of the SM representation. 

Due to color confinement in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) bare quarks — despite being commonly theorized within the framework — have never been detected in isolation. Importantly, I would like to reveal the fact that bare quarks are actually seedicles. 

Quarks are used to define baryons and mesons under the broader category "hadron". Bare quarks are envisioned to be point-like particles; whereas dressed quarks (constituent quarks), are those commonly described as having mass and interact at a relatively-larger scale. Since quarks are basically comprised of flexible dynamic strings (as seedicles), having two ideals for the same particle seems perfectly logical.

Since our seedicle shell-game begins with quarks, and quarks remain highly confined within hadrons — let's familiarize ourselves with hadrons.

5.3 Hadrons Within the Standard Model

Hadrons are a major category in particle physics. Hadrons interact via the strong force and are subdivided into two primary groups: mesons and baryons. 

Since we now understand that bare quarks are actually seedicles, we merely need to count the number of quarks within each particle to determine how many seedicles each contains. Fortunately, it's conventionally understood that mesons contain two quarks and baryons contain three. So, with mesons and baryons, it's basically that simple. The baryon in question has to contain either two or three seedicles.

Since seedicles are virtually massless, we need not be concerned about a particle's mass while tracking seedicles.

For the rest of this section I continue describing baryons for the readers who are unfamiliar. As one progresses through this document, the reasoning behind a particle’s lifetime and mass should become more intuitive.

Curiously, there are well over a hundred particles categorized as hadrons. As hadron resonances and antiparticles are included within the count — their numbers climb immensely!

As far as masses go, the proton is the lightest and most stable baryon. Where a baryon's mass can be upwards to six times that of a proton, a meson's mass ranges from very approximately one-tenth to ten-times that of a proton. 

Distinguishing mesons from baryons largely relies upon spin, however — their quark content also determines one from the other. Notably, mesons contain two quarks (a quark-antiquark pair) and baryons contain three. So structural-wise, baryons are three-quark systems and mesons are quark-antiquark systems — both of whose dynamics and decays are dictated by gluon exchange in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).

Within a meson's quark-antiquark pair — each quark contains equal mass, in addition to equal but opposite charge.

Moreover, since mesons have full-integer spin — they are classified as bosons. In contrast, baryons comprise half-integer spin and are therefore classified as fermions. Fortunately, a comprehensive understanding of spin is not required for our subject matter at hand.

Particle Lifetimes and Stability

5.4 The Power and Consistency of Twos and Threes 

As we determined through the mesons and baryons, twos and threes are pretty basic when it comes to particle interactions. 

Obviously, an individual particle is much too small to be seen or touched by humans, so everything we understand about particles are basically models. For the most part, since we have determined that particles are actually physical constructs — we can delve deeper into potential particle-particle interactions. Here, we begin with the simple aspect of kinetics.

Two-particle Interaction: Kinetics

Let us begin with two particles of relatively equal mass and size; simply referred to as particle A and particle B.

If by chance, these two particles (A & B) happen to meet — they have one of two choices: they can either kinetically bounce off of one another and go their separate ways, or — they can unite (annihilate one another) and form a single unit. There is not a third option under this kinetically-based scenario.

In this scenario, if by chance A and B annihilate each other after a head-on collision — then a new particle is created. Let's simply refer to this new particle as "AB".

By strictly focusing upon kinetics, it's far more likely that A and B glance off of one another than incur a head-on collision and thereby form resultant particle AB. Moreover, if there is not enough kinetic energy available to begin with — then there won't be enough energy to form a new particle.

In this kinetically-based scenario, let us say that there's a five-percent chance that particles A and B annihilate one other in order to form  particle AB. More often than naught however, particles A and B will glance off one another and merely go their separate ways.

Three-particle Interaction: Angular Momentum

We will now add a third particle to the previous scenario. Let us simply refer to this third particle as particle "C."

Under this scenario, particles A and B approach each other with the same kinetic energy as before and forcefully make contact. A recoil action ensues, so these two particles proceed to distance themselves from one other. This is where particle C enters the fray.

Here, particle C acts as an intermediary and limits the recoil effects of one or both of the original particles (A, B). While so doing, this gives time for electromagnetic forces to take affect between the group. So here, in this scenario — we are not only dealing with kinetics, but electromagnetic forces as well.

In effect, the intermediary (C) bides time for particles A and B during the recoil, that allows the weaker (distance-wise) electromagnetic force to take hold and initiate angular momentum. All three particles are ultimately affected due to intermediary C. Once angular momentum is established, it's much easier to create a new particle (ABC). After this three-particle process begins, it's the angular momentum that keeps the reaction going.

The intermediary particle initiates a dance between the three, whereby an oscillation is established between kinetic and electromagnetic forces. This oscillation equates to what we simply refer to as angular momentum.

With the earlier two-particle example, we estimated that there was just a five-percent chance of particles A and B annihilating each other and forming a new particle (AB). However, under the second example we see that the three-particle interaction immensely increases the odds for creating a new type of particle. 

Moreover, the three-particle interaction doesn't have to occur instantaneously to create a new particle. Whereas the two-particle interaction strictly relied upon kinetics which is essentially over after one strike — the three-particle interaction relies upon angular momentum. 

Once angular momentum is established — heat-energy is allowed to rise over a comparably longer period of time versus the strictly kinetic approach. After the three-particle system garners enough heat, they can now fuse together in order to create a new particle (ABC). 

When we compare the potential dynamics between two-particle interactions (or system) versus three — it seems obvious why the highly-stable protons and neutrons are comprised of three quarks and not merely two. 

Merely the existence of angular-momentum itself, can easily cause catalytic effects that support higher and further complex forms of matter. Hence, number three in itself is very common in particle physics. A few familiar examples are shown below.

• Colour charge within quantum chromodynamics is based upon the three primary colours: red, green and blue.
• Quarks have three generations: up/down, charm/strange, top/bottom.
• Leptons as well, have three generations: electron/electron neutrino, muon/muon neutrino, tauon/tauon neutrino.

For those you thinking that this is merely a coincidence, we find that this number three is highly fundamental in the science of biology as well. In biology however, instead of studying subatomic particles — it's molecules that remain the focus.

• Triplet nucleotide sequences (codons) in DNA encode specific amino acids.
• ATP is the common energy currency of the cell. Its energy is stored within a highly-efficient triphosphate group.
• Embryos contain three germ layers: the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm.

Importantly, the thread which pulls this whole section together is the topic of seedicles. This section is further divided into the following sub-subsections:

1. Seedicles Within the Standard Model
2. Electron
3. Proton
4. Neutron
5. The Nature of Particles
6. The Iconic Higgs Boson

5.5.1 Seedicles Within the Standard Model 

The following list represents my current understanding (or best guess) as how these seedicles conform to the Standard Model. Since seedicles are merely just strings, they can be either fully-active, partially-active, or even non-active. The ones remaining non-active and dormant, would likely be coiled up into point-like structures and hidden within composites. 

The number of seedicles shown in the following list, assumes no dormant seedicles. Therefore, this list represents the minimum seedicle requirement for each particle.

• Each electron and positron comprises one seedicle.
• Minimally, W and Z bosons each contain one seedicle.
• Muons comprise two.
• Each tauon comprises three.
• Regardless of wavelength, each photon contains three seedicles.
• Most mesons comprise two, but may also comprise either four or even six.  
• Baryons comprise either three, six, or possibly even nine seedicles. Neutrons however (categorized as baryons) are another matter. 
• Neutrons comprise four seedicles: three internal and one external. 
• Minimally, each quark encompasses one seedicle. 

Using nature as an example, the structures shown below are wind-dispersed seeds that are from either a dandelion or close relative. Their radiating filaments act like sails that easily get pushed along by the wind.

Form-wise, I believe that seedicles are very similar to what's depicted, however likely even simpler. Whereas these dandelion filaments can be soft as cloth, I suspect that seedicle filaments are comprised of something that's typically much harder. Perhaps seedicle filaments can be compared to electrically conductive spring-steel, where its properties are subject to change with extreme temperatures.

Importantly, as each seedicle collects SLLPs and gains sufficient mass — it quickly morphs itself from a seed into an actual "particle".

5.5.2 Electron (e)

Electrons are one of the simplest particles since they incorporate just one seedicle. Since seedicles contain virtually no mass, the electron's mass is obtained through the collection of numerous SLLPs. SLLPs are formed of densely packed matter so they contain a significant amount of mass, even though they have such a minute size.

Depicted below, is a mock-up of a high-speed valence electron. Electrical-magnetic interactions (LEMF) between the electron's seedicle and its plethora of SLLPs — ensures a continuous ring-current about its perimeter.

The electron's spin snatches SLLPs from "empty" space. Once its rim is fully saturated, additional SLLPs that it encounters are merely sloughed off. This could be about the time that the electron experiences its "magnetic moment". 

The image below represents part of a dynamic vision I received in April of 2019. The image to the left represents an electron and the one to the right represents a proton. The yellow border around the electron is its elementary charge.

I believe this vision was showing me what typically occurs during (elastic) electron–proton scattering experiments used to determine a proton's empirical charge-radius.

Electron - Proton

Since the string-like seedicle is the underlying structure for the electron, the electron can take on varying forms. Please note, the earlier drawing of the electron represented a high-speed valence electron and not one that would normally reach an atom’s nucleus. I do not believe that either of these two graphics adequately depicts an electron as it would normally appear while approaching an atom’s nucleus.

5.5.3 Proton (p)

Since protons contain three-quarks, they essentially comprise three seedicles. There is a caveat however, and that is this.

There's always the possibility of a proton's core having more than three seedicles if there are one or more that remain inactive. From time to time —Individual seedicles can, and do  — remain coiled up like point-like balls when not required. Since all seedicles are virtually massless, they have no effect towards the proton's functionality. So, when trapped inside a proton — a dormant seedicle should have no effect upon a proton's mass nor elementary charge.

As I stated earlier, protons have a hardened exterior and are essentially condensates. I understand from the Lord that under normal circumstances they have a physically-hard exterior.  The powerful hadron colliders of today, can easily heat protons until they turn into a quark-gluon plasma (QGP).

The curious fluid inside each proton is analogous to alcohol, but on a sub-subatomic scale. Of course, alcohol withstands temperatures far colder than water without freezing. 

Notably, alcohol has the potential to carry a static electrical charge. It's common for alcohol to build a static electrical charge from friction while flowing through pipes/pumps and such. With alcohol, a significant electrical charge also builds through processes like spraying, pouring, and agitation. So essentially, the proton's elementary charge is stored within this curious alcohol like matter (CALM).

5.5.4 Neutron (n)

Similar to the proton, each neutron has exactly three quarks. Their quarks comprise one up quark (+2/3 e) and two down quarks (-1/3 e). The net-effect of these three quarks, negates its elementary charge. Again, since the basis of quarks are seedicles — neutrons comprise three seedicles. This is the conventional understanding.

Regardless of the preceding statement, surprisingly — each neutron is basically a proton with one additional seedicle. 

In order to negate a protons elementary charge, one seedicle wraps around its shell. This just occurs on the neutron's exposed area within the atom's nucleus. Since seedicles are primarily strings, they can easily wrap themselves around the proton like a glove. This phenomenon is what transforms a proton into a neutron. It's the extra seedicle that negates the proton's elementary charge and converts it into a neutron.

In other words, a seedicle has the uncanny ability to shield a proton from electrons, so that it can't interact with anything beyond the bounds of the atom's nucleus. As a result, it becomes classified as a neutron. 

Please be aware, that the overall effect within an atom's nucleus is obviously more complicated that what I have just described, but basically — this is the phenomenon that creates neutrons.

The neutron is the only particle where its decay time is measured in minutes. During beta-minus decay — a NEUTRON within an unstable nucleus spontaneously decays into a proton, an electron, and an electron-antineutrino. 

Similarly, during free neutron beta-decay — an isolated NEUTRON left to its own demise — decays into a proton, electron and an electron-antineutrino. This naturally occurs in just under fifteen-minutes.

Notably, an INVERSE PROCESS can occur here as well. During beta-plus decay (also referred to as positron emission) a PROTON within an atomic nucleus is transformed into a neutron by emitting a positron and an electron-neutrino.

These three examples of particle-decay — were all mediated by the weak nuclear force. From what I understand, whether a neutron is transformed into a proton, or a proton is transformed into a neutron — the quarks within the associated proton's core remain intact. What changes exactly, is the seedicle arrangement upon the nucleon's surface!

Since seedicles are virtually massless, a couple more or a couple less — does not significantly affect the atom's mass.

5.5.5 The Nature of Particles

This sub-section contains a few personal thoughts regarding particles in general. 

At one time, I naively thought that tracking seedicles through well-defined decay processes (decay-widths and branching ratios) should be reasonably straightforward. I have found that unfortunately, it's not that simple. Nonetheless, seedicle tracking through particle-decay can be achieved in limited circumstances.

I believe that due to God's clever design, there is always an abundance of seedicles on earth which ensures predictable branching-ratios (BR) during particle decay. Hence, there's a chance that inherent to every SM particle (subatomic) there could be an extra seedicle that remains dormant or seldomly called upon. Analogously, this would be something like carrying one or more spare-tires within the trunk of your car. 

In order to save space within modern vehicles, spare-tires are usually much smaller than their counterpart. This is not unlike compactified seedicles which can be coiled and point-like in form when optimized in order to save space. 

In some ways, particles are similar to people — they don't like to be either too hot or too cold. Although they are certainly attracted to one other, if there is too much heat within their environment, they tend to disperse rather quickly.

Consider that temperature is always measured as an average temperature. For example, if we consider one's core-body temperature — it is merely an average-temperature due to the trillions of cells that comprise our body. Here, each cell contributes a certain amount of heat towards the overall body temperature. The temperature that we can easily measure is an average-temperature of our body's trillions of cells. 

Curiously, it has been determined that within individual cells, there can be a difference of perhaps two-degrees Celsius. If I recall correctly, I've run across articles that describe a cell's delta-temperature as considerably greater than merely two-degrees.

The point being, the smaller we go in magnitude-of-scale — the more likelihood it is that we will detect a variance of temperature. This concept holds true regardless of what we are measuring. 

Particles themselves have the ability to both heat and cool. Since the atom's nucleus contains much of its invariant mass, this is also where most of its heat resides. Electrons traversing an atom's structure serve as a means for atomic convection.

This idea of particles not liking excessive-heat manifests itself in a variety of ways. I believe this concept is self-evident due to certain reactions in particle physics. The following interactions are prime examples.

• Thermal dileptons (lepton/antilepton pairs) which emerge from hot quark-gluon plasma.
• The obvious quark/antiquark reaction within mesons (resonance).  
• Scattering that occurs between particles and antiparticles.

A substantial part of an atom's environment consists of the sub-subatomic water we discussed back in chapter-three. This minute form of water serves to disperse heat energy amongst molecules. Particle-wise, this ensures moderate temperatures, and likewise — stability.

For round numbers, I believe that there are approximately one-thousand SLLPs within each electron. Considering that there's merely one stringed seedicle per electron — that's a thousand-to-one ratio.

Continuing along this train of thought, consider the number of electrons within each atom typically matches its atomic number (Z). So, there's certainly a myriad of SLLPs within each atom if there's a thousand for each electron.

As a quick example, let's use the chemical element neon. Neon has the atomic number (Z) ten, so it has ten electrons and ten protons. Here, if each of its electrons comprise a thousand SLLPs, then each neon atom contains about ten-thousand SLLPs! We would be forever and a day, trying to determine what's actually going on with its individual SLLPs. 

Basically, we have come full circle and have caught up to the scientific study of quantum mechanics. Seemingly, we are limited to using mathematical statistics to describe what's physically occurs within the atom.

Understandably at this extremely-fine scale, we are now peering into the spiritual realm. Crucially, as a matter of respect — please understand that this is God's "scientific" domain and not mankind's.

5.5.7 (3) An Unconventional Understanding of the Higgs Boson

What I am about to describe here, is a unique interpretation of the processes that lead up to forming a Higgs boson.

Importantly, the Higgs boson is the only elementary particle that has zero spin. This essentially means, it has no intrinsic angular momentum and is therefore a scalar.

This next thought is certainly not precise, but I believe this zero-spin characteristic could be a unique way of describing an explosion. Particularly since explosions project outwards in all directions from a central point and exhibit zero angular-momentum. Although this was my initial thought as I scanned through visuals of the Higgs boson, I believe we can now go far deeper.

Gravity:  I believe that gravity's effect is negligible in high speed particle experiments. Generally speaking, matter is oblivious to earth’s gravity until it advances to the stage of an atom. Atomic structures are influenced by gravity, whereas particles not bound by atoms are not; or certainly not to the same extent.

Gravity is basically a function and feature of quantum mechanics. I attempted to explain this earlier, within the "Gravity over Mass Concept". So, for the most part — gravity is a none-factor during Higgs boson production.

Environment: At the LHC, proton–proton hard scattering takes place in an ultra-high vacuum inside the beam pipe. The detectors sit just outside that vacuum around the beryllium pipe. Conditions in the pipe at the crossing are as follows:

• The residual gas is mostly H2, with H2O and other species present only in trace amounts. 
• The beam vacuum is an ultra-high vacuum from which moisture has been removed. At the interaction point, the beam pipe is a thin beryllium tube so that low-Z particles can easily escape into the detector. The pressure here is about 10^−9 to 10^-10 millibar (10^-7 to 10^-8 pascals). 
• Whereas the beryllium beam pipe (at the interaction point) is near room temperature — most of the ring is cooled to 1.9 K, with the beam screen at 5–20 K.

Since virtually all of the H2O has been removed from the vacuum, quite likely most of its sub-subatomic water has been removed here as well. In either case,  it's a very dry environment and ideal for sustaining electromagnetic interactions.

Hard Scattering: Protons have a hard exterior, so “hard scattering” describes this process nicely. This hard scattering is analogous to the tremendous amount of energy it takes to shatter safety-glass.

Force: After the hadron collider’s initial state (proton-proton collisions) the Light electromagnetic force (LEMF) is what dominates over extremely short distances. The SM's electromagnetic force (SEMF) doesn’t arise until later in the process and over comparatively larger distances.

Type of Matter: The proton’s spherical shell is comprised of a neatly orientated and fused matrix of SLLPs. Its innards comprise three seedicles as well as a curious alcohol like matter (CALM) that's normally encapsulated. Its seedicles remain partially coiled within the CALM fluid.

Hard Scattering Process: During the hard-scattering process as protons experience direct strikes — they instantly burst open. After this event (which requires a certain threshold of energy) a plethora of SLLPs get released and instantly scatter. Consider how safety-glass normally shatters into large pieces as well as smaller shards and slivers. These shattered pieces, seedicles, and liquid CALM — comprise what's normally described as "partons". Conventionally, partons are understood to be quarks, anti-quarks, and gluons.

This is difficult to explain at this stage, but the proton's shell is more than merely a fused conglomerate of SLLPs. There is yet another form of matter that would normally ensure the proton remains intact, regardless of the process.

In a large part, this extra binding is what significantly slows-down certain physical processes, some of which are "particle decay". I believe this extra binding is what causes the phenomenon of "strangeness".  

In either case, this extra binding is what keeps the proton's shell from simply shattering into a plethora of extremely small pieces. So, instead of its shell shattering into say approximately one-hundred pieces — it breaks into possibly three, four, or six clumps. Here, each clump represents a bundle of SLLPs that so happen to carry an electrical charge. Proceeding now, a series of processes will attempt to cobble together these severely-damaged hadrons. 

SLLP Ring Creation: Powered by the Light electromagnetic force (LEMF), individual SLLPs lightly-interact with one another. As seedicles are released from each proton (due to their three-quark character) each seedicle potentially becomes a catalyst, which is dependent of course upon the availability of SLLPs.

As a catalyst, a stringed seedicle first interacts with a comparatively-small group of SLLPs. This action begins to amplify the LEMF. The process continues (which is virtually instantaneous from our standpoint) until a large ring of SLLPs form. Here, a single seedicle (the catalyst) now sits at the edge of the ring.

Once this seedicle has garnered a vast number of SLLPs and its ring has filled out — it becomes a fixed composite unit. In effect, a single seedicle alongside numerous SLLPs have been transformed into a ring-shaped object that’s now electrically on par with the SEMF. Here, an elementary charge is now presented by the ring itself. Basically, this ring has matured into a SM particle — or, at the very least — a virtual particle.

Duplicate Rings: Once a second seedicle in addition to an appropriate amount of SLLPs enter the fray — a second-ring is created alongside the first. So, there are now two rings of comparable size in close proximity, where each ring carries an elementary charge.

Creating the Higgs Boson: We now have two rings with disparate elementary charges that can interact over a relatively-long distance via the SEMF. Here, two disparate charges now pull the rings together. This is the final action and instant when the Higgs boson is created. 

After these two composite rings collide, the SLLPs fan out and get dispersed. At this stage a new form emerges, one that's basically an electrically-charged cloud of SLLPs. This cloud fills a volume of space which we can now refer to as the Higgs boson. Remember, it's the dense SLLPs which ultimately contain a particle's invariant mass. 

The two seedicles used as catalysts to create the rings, now remain centered within the Higgs boson. The overall electrical charge within the cloud quickly diminishes. 

Volume of Space: The Higgs boson is described as a point-like particle even though it has a tremendous amount of mass. Note, SLLPs on their own cannot be detected since they comprise the spiritual world. It's the seedicles that function like miniature bridges and straddle the gap between the LR and the SMR. Basically, each seedicle pulls together an analog of SLLPs from the LR and creates a digital-point within the SMR. 

So, from the standpoint of the Standard Model — it’s the seedicles that remain the focal-point for the Higgs boson, not the comparatively large cloud of SLLPs where the bulk of the Higg's invariant mass resides.

The mass of the Higgs boson is ~133.5 times that of a proton. Since we understand that invariant mass ultimately stems from a certain SLLP population regardless of the particle in question — we can now begin to visualize particle-size versus mass. Again, protons are the ultimate measuring stick for empirical size.

SLLP Calculation: From my understanding, virtually all invariant mass emerges from SLLPs. For round numbers, I've estimated that there’s approximately 1,000 SLLPs within each electron. At the moment, for myself — the electron is the easiest particle to approximate its quantity of SLLPs. Since we know the invariant masses for both the electron and the Higgs boson, perhaps we can do a little comparison now between the two.

Using natural units, the electron has an invariant mass of ~0.511 MeV/c2 and the Higgs has an invariant mass of ~125.1 GeV/c2. So, the mass of the Higgs boson is ~245,000 times that of the electron. So, if each electron contains ~1,000 SLLPs, then the Higgs boson contains a whopping 245 million SLLPs! This seems like an unfathomable number, but this is result. I suspect something is amiss here, but where to begin? Until we develop particle models that take into account SLLPs, this thought is difficult to rationalize.

Variations of the Process: Notably, there are variations before and after the creation of the Higgs boson which I have neglected to discuss. I believe the basic concept of the Higgs boson, is that it takes left-over matter from the scattering process and proceeds to establish a complex unit that balances electrical energy against the available mass. While so doing, the overall process tries to organize physical chunks of mass by using a predetermined amount of electrical energy (e.g.; manifolds in particle physics).

As the Higgs boson decays, subsequent hadronization sequences occur at relatively-longer timescales.

The hadronization process creates colour-neutral hadrons (mesons, baryons, exotic hadrons, glueballs). Generally speaking, energy is conserved (mass and energy related by E=mc^2) and the system settles into colour-neutral bound states. 

Time: Earlier, I had stated that gravity is a feature of quantum mechanics. Importantly, quantum mechanics is not only required for us to experience gravity — but time as well. Here, various atomic structures are organized to make comparatively larger and larger forms of matter (planets, stars) so that we can all experience time in a similar manner. There was no "standard time" here in this space, before the existence of the Universe.

Think of time like a powerful, yet gently flowing river. Rivers always flow downwards and never in the opposite direction. I have noticed however, that from time to time — a river's water can flow in the opposite direction if it becomes isolated from the primary-flow. This can occur when water gets trapped behind a stationary log or rock. Visually, this reversal can be detected by looking at the swirling water behind a protruding rock near the shore. Ultimately, however — this water gets ushered back into the primary flow and continues down the river.

Antiparticles themselves are common bits of matter that have been temporarily isolated from the predominant flow (or arrow of time). Ultimately, these antiparticles are persuaded to conform to the arrow-of-time merely due to their environment. This is something like driving a car the wrong way on a one-way street: the longer one continues driving in opposition to the regular flow of traffic — the more difficult it becomes, if not impossible.

Time Dilation: The time that we base our clocks on is basically determined by atomic structures and their aggregates. So from our perspective, particle interactions that occur at deeper levels that don't adhere to our time scales are often perceived to be curious anomalies (e.g.; instantaneous symmetry breaking during W and Z boson production).

Imagine now, if we could travel smaller in magnitude-of-scale and peer into interactions that occur at the sub-subatomic level. I'm sure there are energetic ripples of energy that occur there on a regular basis of which we are totally unawares. The time-standard within the Light Realm (LR) is foreign to how humanity currently perceives time.

Back in chapter-two, I had stated that the smaller we go in scale, the more efficient it becomes to store, retrieve, and process information. Considering the difference between granular scales, the LR's environment should be far-more efficient and exponentially faster than ours!

At the LHC — the beryllium beam pipe(s) located at interaction point(s) is what's used to separate two different environments. Whereas its detectors sit in a climate-controlled room that's close to ATP — the area inside of the pipe (and likewise the whole 27 km ring) contains an ultra-high vacuum that's void of virtually all H2O and perhaps even most sub-subatomic water as well. Since common atoms require this sub-subatomic water for their existence, this type of water is ubiquitous in Earth's lower atmosphere.

During the p-p hard-scattering process under tremendous energies — composite protons commonly get cracked open and thereby release their curious alcohol-like matter (CALM). Although I certainly can't state exactly what this CALM is (since I merely understand from the Lord that it's sub-subatomic alcohol), I see that simple alcohols do serve a number of purposes that may be beneficial from a sub-subatomic perspective.

Short-chain alcohols (methanol, ethanol, isopropyl) have higher vapour pressure than water and evaporate faster at room temperature. Liquid films of these alcohols on a grounded conductor dissipate electrostatic charge better than dry air or insulating hydrocarbon solvents. These same alcohols can still become electrically charged whenever pumped, poured, or sprayed, especially when dry and electrically isolated.

From the information we've covered thus far, I will provide an early interpretation of p-p hard scattering events from the aspect of time.